Portrait of Ruth Kornfeld
Portrait of Johannes Czakai
Royal letters patent on a decree of the National Assembly regarding citizenship for Sephardic Jews, 1790, JMS 2259.2.2
Royal letters patent on a decree of the National Assembly concerning the protection of the Jews in Alsace and in the other provinces, 16.04.1790, JMS 2259.2.3
Königlicher Patentbrief zu einem Dekret der Nationalversammlung bezüglich des Abschaffung der Sonderabgaben für Juden, 07.08.1790, JMS 2259.2.4

Dekret betreffend die Juden, die keinen festen Familiennamen und Vornamen haben, 20.07.1808, JMS 2259.

Portrait of Ruth Kornfeld

Portrait of Johannes Czakai

Royal letters patent on a decree of the National Assembly regarding citizenship for Sephardic Jews, 1790, JMS 2259.2.2

Royal letters patent on a decree of the National Assembly concerning the protection of the Jews in Alsace and in the other provinces, 16.04.1790, JMS 2259.2.3

Königlicher Patentbrief zu einem Dekret der Nationalversammlung bezüglich des Abschaffung der Sonderabgaben für Juden, 07.08.1790, JMS 2259.2.4

«His goal was to assimilate Jews with non-Jews»

A Decree, a Donation and Four Questions on Jewish Surnames

The Jewish Muse­um of Switz­er­land has gra­teful­ly accept­ed a dona­ti­on from the late Ruth Korn­feld of Zurich encom­pas­sing decrees, oaths, and pro­cla­ma­ti­ons from the 16th to the 19th cen­tu­ries that address the legal sta­tus of Jews. Among them is a French decree from 1808 man­da­ting Jews to adopt sur­na­mes. In an inter­view with muse­um direc­tor Dr. Nao­mi Lubrich, his­to­ri­an Dr. Johan­nes Cza­kai (Jeru­sa­lem) explains why sur­na­mes were assi­gned throug­hout Euro­pe during this peri­od, how Jewish names were inven­ted, and why some Jewish Gali­ci­an had sur­na­mes of sites in Switzerland.

Nao­mi Lubrich: Dear Johan­nes, What is the histo­ry of Jewish sur­na­mes, how far do they go back? 

Johan­nes Cza­kai: Some medieval Jewish fami­lies alre­a­dy had sur­na­mes. But at the end of the 18th cen­tu­ry, the majo­ri­ty of Jews didn’t yet have sur­na­mes. With the moder­niza­ti­on of the Euro­pean sta­tes, this chan­ged, and in dif­fe­rent ways across the con­ti­nent: In the Habs­burg Empire, Emper­or Joseph II refor­med Jewish legis­la­ti­on in the 1780s. To impro­ve admi­nis­tra­ti­on and the tax sys­tem, he man­da­ted that Jews adopt distin­gu­is­ha­ble, her­edi­ta­ry fami­ly names so that they could be iden­ti­fied. Ano­ther reason was the belief that their lan­guage, Yid­dish, stood in the way of their cul­tu­ral «impro­ve­ment.» And one means to that end – at least in the Aus­tri­an pro­vin­ce of Gali­cia – was to obli­ge them to take Ger­man names.

The various regi­ons had dif­fe­rent prio­ri­ties. When France man­da­ted in 1808 that its Jewish citi­zens adopt fixed fami­ly names, the goal was found to be «noble,» name­ly to eman­ci­pa­te them and dis­mant­le reli­gious bar­riers. From the per­spec­ti­ve of Napo­leo­nic legis­la­ti­on, Jews and non-Jews were not to be distin­gu­is­hed by name. Fol­lo­wing France’s exam­p­le, the sta­tes of the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on of the Rhi­ne issued simi­lar decrees – in the Grand Duchy of Baden, neigh­bor­ing Switz­er­land, for ins­tance, in 1809. Some sta­tes, howe­ver, man­da­ted sur­na­mes for Jews deca­des later. Others never did so at all. To my know­ledge, Switz­er­land never pas­sed such a decree.

NL: Who inven­ted and dis­tri­bu­ted surnames? 

JC: This also varied from regi­on to regi­on. To begin with, most regu­la­ti­ons – from France to Baden, West­pha­lia, Bava­ria, Prus­sia, Aus­tria, and Rus­sia – sti­pu­la­ted that Jews should choo­se their own names. Jud­ging from  the names given in the indi­vi­du­al count­ries, this is inde­ed what hap­pen­ed to a lar­ge ext­ent. Espe­ci­al­ly in Ger­man-spea­king regi­ons, whe­re Wes­tern Yid­dish and Ger­man were very simi­lar, we can assu­me that for Jews, adop­ting a Ger­man name was lin­gu­i­sti­cal­ly unpro­ble­ma­tic. Many were com­mon Yid­dish first names, such as Hirsch, Mey­er, and Wolff; place names like Bam­ber­ger and Land­au; and house names, like Adler and Stern. Some, such as Drei­fuss, Ein­stein, or Oppen­hei­mer, were used long befo­re the decrees were writ­ten. Other names were new crea­ti­ons, such as Blu­men­thal, Löwen­stein, and Rosen­berg. The­re is evi­dence that non-Jewish offi­ci­als rejec­ted some new­ly cho­sen names. In most cases, they wan­ted to avo­id place names as fami­ly names, as the­se might appear too «Jewish.»

The situa­ti­on was more com­pli­ca­ted in the Habs­burg Mon­ar­chy. In Gali­cia, the name decrees led to hundreds of thou­sands of Yid­dish-spea­king Jews adop­ting pre­do­mi­nant­ly Ger­man sur­na­mes, such as Bren­ner, Fried­mann, Neu­mann, Rosen­berg, Sin­ger, and Weiss. Unli­ke in Ger­man-spea­king regi­ons, this was not out  of patrio­tic sen­ti­ment, but rather becau­se Ger­man-spea­king offi­ci­als had inven­ted most of the names. They were legal­ly aut­ho­ri­zed to do so. Alt­hough a pro­vi­si­on allo­wed the Jewish heads of house­holds to choo­se their name, offi­ci­als in fact most often inven­ted all the names in the town them­sel­ves. There’s a theo­ry that most of the­se names were meant to be insul­ting, but it can’t be sub­stan­tia­ted. Absurd to down­right hateful name crea­ti­ons – such as «Affen­ge­sicht» (Mon­key Face), «Gold­schaum» (Gold Foam), and «Schlan­gen­kopf» (Sna­ke Head) – sug­gest that some of the offi­cers were mali­cious and anti­se­mi­tic. Yet the majo­ri­ty appears to have been for­med from Ger­man nouns and adjec­ti­ves, wit­hout the inten­ti­on of stig­ma­tiz­ing tho­se bea­ring them.

NL: Cer­tain Eas­tern Euro­pean Jewish fami­lies have place names from Switz­er­land and sou­thern Ger­ma­ny. Which ones were the­se, and what is your theo­ry as to why? 

JC: From the per­spec­ti­ve of Swiss Jewish histo­ry, the Jewish sur­na­mes Appen­zel­ler, Ber­ner, Endin­ger, Klin­ge­nau, Lenz­bur­ger, Zür­cher, and Zur­gil­gen are both intri­guing and puz­zling, as the­se fami­lies did not live in Switz­er­land or sou­thern Ger­ma­ny, but over a thousand kilo­me­ters away in Buko­vina, a regi­on that was once part of the Aus­tri­an pro­vin­ce of Gali­cia. The­re is no know­ledge of Jews having migra­ted from the Upper Rhi­ne to Eas­tern Euro­pe at that time, so the names caught my atten­ti­on and prompt­ed me to inves­ti­ga­te fur­ther. Even­tual­ly, I dis­co­ver­ed that Johann Fide­lis Erg­ge­let, the Aus­tri­an offi­ci­al who, in 1786, signed the decree requi­ring Jewish fami­lies in Buko­vina to adopt fixed sur­na­mes, was ori­gi­nal­ly from Walds­hut. The new names in Buko­vina bear a striking resem­blan­ce to places, peo­p­le, and even field names known only to locals in the bor­der town on the Rhi­ne, such as Lie­der­mat, Roh­al­den, and Schmie­de­nau­er. Most likely, they were assi­gned by someone who came from this regi­on, and that would have been Erg­ge­let. I argue that Erg­ge­let did not assign the­se names to ridi­cu­le Jews or to stig­ma­ti­ze them, on the con­tra­ry: He was a typi­cal Aus­tri­an civil ser­vant of the Jose­phi­ni­an Enligh­ten­ment era, and his goal was to advan­ce the pro­xi­mi­ty of Jews to the non-Jewish popu­la­ti­on through what he con­side­red «nor­mal» names and to break down cul­tu­ral bar­riers. He appar­ent­ly, howe­ver, didn’t con­sider that much of the non-Jewish popu­la­ti­on of Buko­vina had Roma­ni­an or Ukrai­ni­an names, and that Jews’ sou­thern Ger­man names would, over the cour­se of the natio­na­list uphe­avals of the 19th cen­tu­ry, come to sym­bo­li­ze cul­tu­ral separation.

NL: What other ques­ti­ons are being explo­red in Jewish onomastics?

JC: Names help us under­stand a fasci­na­ting peri­od of Jewish histo­ry; yet we still know far too litt­le. It remains unclear to what ext­ent Jews accept­ed or rejec­ted the names impo­sed on them. In some cases, we know that eman­ci­pa­ted Jews in Ger­man-spea­king regi­ons reac­ted enthu­si­a­sti­cal­ly to the name decrees becau­se they belie­ved that a civil name would be one more step toward equal rights. In Ham­burg, for exam­p­le, com­mu­ni­ty lea­ders asked the city admi­nis­tra­ti­on for per­mis­si­on to adopt fixed names. But we have no first­hand accounts from the peo­p­le who adopted new fami­ly names around 1800. The­r­e­fo­re, we can most­ly only spe­cu­la­te as to whe­ther they cho­se their names them­sel­ves, were forced to do so, and what they gene­ral­ly thought of the new names. Were Yid­dish-spea­king Jews even awa­re of the exact mea­ning of their Ger­man sur­na­me? Was Mr. Sei­den­tuch given his name becau­se he traded in silk scar­ves, or was his name cho­sen arbi­tra­ri­ly? Did Mr. Schil­ler want to express his admi­ra­ti­on for the gre­at wri­ter? None of this can be ans­we­red in gene­ral terms; it can only be cla­ri­fied through a detail­ed bio­gra­phi­cal exami­na­ti­on of indi­vi­du­al cases.

Fur­ther­mo­re, I won­der to what ext­ent ste­reo­ty­pi­cal images asso­cia­ted with «Jewish» names have sur­vi­ved to this day. Names, like other attri­bu­tes, can con­vey anti­se­mi­tic codes and label a per­son as sup­po­sedly «Jewish.» Take, for ins­tance, anti­se­mi­tic con­spi­ra­cy nar­ra­ti­ves that fan­ta­size about the alle­ged power of «the Roth­schilds,» who­se Jewish ori­g­ins are impli­ed through their name, ori­gi­nal­ly from Frankfurt’s Juden­gas­se. Most peo­p­le may not even be awa­re of this con­nec­tion. It would be important and fasci­na­ting to exami­ne this per­cep­ti­on more clo­se­ly and to ask how the ste­reo­ty­pe of the «Jewish» name has chan­ged sin­ce the 19th cen­tu­ry and con­ti­nues to cir­cu­la­te in jokes, books, and movies today.

NL: Dear Johan­nes, Many thanks for your insights!

verfasst am 29.05.2026